Home Roland Rocchiccioli Slavery is more common today than when it was “abolished”.

Slavery is more common today than when it was “abolished”.


Just two columns ago I wrote a piece about modern slavery, which I described as the scourge of the world.

Slavery is more common today than when it was “abolished”.

In fact, there are more slaves now than at any time in human history. Our region — the Asia Pacific — is home to about half of the world’s 45.8 million slaves.

Again, I was appalled, but not surprised, at a news story carried online by The New Daily. The factory workers who make your clothes could be paid less than 39-cents an hour, according to an Oxfam Australia report.

The ‘What She Makes’ report, found factory workers were paid just 4-per cent of the retail price of clothing sold in Australia.

In Bangladesh, Australia’s second-biggest garments exporter, that figure was just 2-per cent of retail prices – or 20 cents for a $10 item: “If we were paid a little more money, then I could one day send my son to school; we could live happily, we could lead a better life,” Bangladeshi woman Forida said in the report, released on Sunday.

Forida, 22, said she was paid just 35 cents an hour making garments for Target Australia, and other international brands, at a factory in Bangladesh’s capital of Dhaka. The minimum wage is 39-cents an hour, but Forida said her pay was illegally docked for mistakes and failing to hit impossible targets.

Deloitte Access Economics, which conducted the research for Oxfam, said paying factory workers a living wage would increase the price of clothing sold in Australia by just one per cent. Oxfam Australia Chief Executive Helen Szoke said retailers could easily absorb the cost to lift potentially millions of people out of poverty: “To be honest, we were shocked that wages were such a small part of the price of a garment. And that makes the case even more compelling, because it’s an easy out,” Dr Szoke told The New Daily.

The cost of living in Australia is high, and everyone is looking to save money; however, are we so desperate to save – ‘grab a bargain’ – that we will turn a blind eye to an opportunity which is borne of someone else’s misery? The exploitation of these hapless, third–world factory workers tell us more about us than it does about them. For my part, I am reluctant to buy clothes which are made in Bangladesh, and when I do I am brushed with guilt. The conditions under which these people work are known to many, and have been the subject of countless newspaper and television exposes. Not for a nanosecond do I believe that clothing Australian manufacturers are unaware of the appalling conditions and the miserable plight of those making the garments which they sell at great profit. The reality being: they are interested only in the bottom-line profit, and not about paying a few cents more to raise a defenceless victim out of abject poverty.

Oxfam warned Australians against boycotting brands.

Instead, Dr Szoke called on shoppers to contact their favourite stores on social media and ask if its garment workers were paid a living wage: “We think that these retailers are very heavily tapped into consumer sentiment so messages from their buyers make a difference.” She said a boycott would run the risk of denying the communities work, and that wages in countries like Bangladesh were kept down to attract international brands. Sadly, Bangladesh is probably the hardest nut to crack because the garment industry provides about 80-percent of their GDP. Workers in Bangladesh are paid 39 cents an hour which is a long way off a sustainable existence for those people.

Oxfam designed a step-by-step strategy for brands to ensure workers in their supply chain were paid a living wage within six years. Dr Szoke said 17 brands had already committed to work towards a living wage. The advocacy group will also publicly track the progress of Australian retailers like Kmart, Big W, Bonds, Cotton On and Just Jeans.

The detail of their conditions is sobering. Forida lives with her husband, a rice miller, and toddler son in a Dhaka compound with six other families. The families share one toilet and place to bathe between them. The 22-year-old also supports her mother-in-law, who cares for her son while she goes to work.

Another Bangladeshi garment worker, Fatima, said she slept on the concrete floor of a two-bedroom apartment with 10 other people: “If I was paid a better wage, I would move into a flat and bring my mother with me because now, whenever I am able to eat, I’m always thinking, ‘I am eating but how is my mother right now? I can’t see her. Is she eating as well? Is she getting food?’,” Fatima said.

Many of the women move away from their families to Dhaka and send what’s left of their wages home. They tended to live in tin homes reminiscent of “chicken coops”, Dr Szoke said. Eighty-percent were women aged 18 to 25, and many worked six days a week: “If they’re paid a living wage, they can begin to make some choices,” Dr Szoke said. “The living wage is not going to be a silver bullet immediately overnight. But it starts to break the cycle of poverty and increases the choices that these people can make about their own lives.” Roland can be heard each MONDAY morning on 3BA at 10.30.

Contact: rolandroc@bigpond.com